What Does It Cost To Repair Fiberglass Blisters

Authored by Joseph Mercola via LewRockwell.com,

From the beginning of the COVID-nineteen pandemic, the blaring call has been to examination, exam and test some more. All the same, right from the start, serious questions arose about the tests beingness used to diagnose this infection, and questions take simply multiplied since then.

Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used every bit the justification for keeping large portions of the globe locked down for the better function of 2022.

This, despite the fact that PCR tests have proven remarkably unreliable with high false effect rates, and aren't designed to exist used every bit a diagnostic tool in the first identify as they cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and "live" or reproductive ones.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president and scientific manager of Pfizer, has even gone on record stating that false positive results from unreliable PCR tests are being used to "industry a 'second wave' based on 'new cases,'" when in fact a 2nd wave is highly unlikely.

Understanding PCR Tests

Earlier his death, the inventor of the PCR examination, Kary Mullis, repeatedly all the same unsuccessfully stressed that this test should not be used as a diagnostic tool for the simple reason that it's incapable of diagnosing disease.

A positive test does non actually mean that an active infection is present. As noted in a U.South. Centers for Disease Control and prevention publication on coronavirus and PCR testing dated July thirteen 2022:

Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2022-nCoV is the causative amanuensis for clinical symptoms.
The performance of this examination has not been established for monitoring handling of 2022-nCoV infection.
This exam cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.

So, what does the PCR test actually tell u.s.? The PCR swab collects RNA from your nasal cavity. This RNA is so reverse transcribed into Deoxyribonucleic acid. Notwithstanding, the genetic snippets are so small they must be amplified in club to get discernible. Each circular of amplification is chosen a bicycle.

Amplification over 35 cycles is considered unreliable and scientifically unjustified, yet Drosten tests and tests recommended by the Globe Health Arrangement are set to 45 cycles.

What this does is amplify any, even insignificant sequences of viral Dna that might be present to the signal that the test reads "positive," fifty-fifty if the viral load is extremely low or the virus is inactive. As a result of these excessive bicycle thresholds, you terminate upwards with a far higher number of positive tests than you would otherwise.

We've also had issues with faulty and contaminated tests. Equally soon as the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 became available in January 2022, German researchers quickly adult a PCR test for the virus.

In March 2022, The New York Times reported the initial test kits adult by the CDC had been plant to be flawed. The Verge also reported that this flawed CDC test in turn became the basis for the WHO's test, which the CDC ended up refusing to employ.

PCR Tests Cannot Find Infection

Perhaps most importantly of all, the PCR tests cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and "live" or reproductive ones.

What that means is that PCR tests cannot find infection. Menstruation. It cannot tell y'all whether you lot're currently ill, whether you'll develop symptoms in the near future, or whether yous're contagious.

The tests may pick up dead debris or inactive viral particles that pose no adventure any to the patient and others. What's more, the test can selection up the presence of other coronaviruses, so a positive effect may only point that y'all've recuperated from a mutual cold in the past.

An "infection" is when a virus penetrates into a prison cell and replicates. As the virus multiplies, symptoms prepare in. A person is only infectious if the virus is really replicating. As long as the virus is inactive and non replicating, information technology's completely harmless both to the host and others.

Chances are, if you have no symptoms, a positive test simply ways it has detected inactive viral Dna in your body. This would also mean that you lot are not contagious and pose no adventure to anyone.

For all of these reasons, a number of highly respected scientists around the world are now saying that what we have is not a COVID-xix pandemic but a PCR test pandemic. In his September 20, 2022, article5 "Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics — The Deadly Danger of False Positives," Yeadon explains why basing our pandemic response on positive PCR tests is so problematic.

In brusque, it appears millions of people are but being constitute to acquit inactive viral Deoxyribonucleic acid that pose no risk to anyone, yet these exam results are existence used by the global technocracy to implement a brand new economical and social arrangement based on draconian surveillance and totalitarian controls.

Artificially Created Justifications for Totalitarian Controls

Equally reported by The Vaccine Reaction, September 29, 2022:

"The test'due south threshold is so high that information technology detects people with the live virus besides as those with a few genetic fragments left over from a past infection that no longer poses a risk. Information technology'southward like finding a hair in a room subsequently a person left it, says Michael Mina, MD, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The New York Times institute...

'Nosotros've been using one type of data for everything, and that is but plus or minus — that'due south all,' Dr. Mina said. 'We're using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy determination-making.'

But 'yes' or 'no' isn't skillful enough, he added. It's the amount of virus that should dictate the infected patient's next steps. 'It's actually irresponsible, I recollect, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative upshot,' Dr. Mina said."

Again, medical experts agree whatsoever cycle threshold over 35 cycles makes the examination too sensitive, as at that bespeak information technology starts picking upward harmless inactive Dna fragments. Mina believes a more reasonable cutoff would be 30 or less.

Co-ordinate to The New York Times, the CDC'due south own calculations show it's extremely unlikely to detect live viruses in samples that have gone through more than 33 cycles, and inquiry published in April 2022 concluded patients with positive PCR tests that had a cycle threshold above 33 were not contagious and could safely be discharged from the hospital or home isolation.

Chiefly, when officials at the New York state laboratory, the Wadsworth Heart, reanalyzed testing data at The Times' request, they plant that changing the threshold from 40 cycles to 35 cycles eliminated about 43% of the positive results. Limiting information technology to 30 cycles eliminated a whopping 63%. The Vaccine Reaction adds:

"In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90% of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of forty would have been deemed negative if the threshold were 30 cycles, Dr. Mina said. 'I would say that none of those people should exist contact-traced, not 1,' he said.

'I'm really shocked that it could be that high — the proportion of people with high CT value results,' said Ashish Jha, MD, managing director of the Harvard Global Health Institute. 'Boy, does it really change the way we need to be thinking about testing'...

In late Baronial, the U.Due south. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first rapid coronavirus test that doesn't need any special reckoner equipment. Made past Abbot Laboratories, the 15-infinitesimal test [BinaxNOW] will sell for U.Due south. $five simply nevertheless requires a nasal swab to exist taken by a health worker.

The Abbot test is the fourth rapid bespeak-of-intendance examination that looks for the presence of antigens rather than the virus's genetic code every bit the PCR molecular tests practice."

Massive Waste product of Resources

As noted by Dr. Tom Jefferson and professor Carl Henegan in an October 31, 2022, article in the Daily Mail,16 mass PCR testing has been a massive waste matter or resources, as it doesn't provide us with the data we really need to know — who'due south infectious, how far is the virus spreading and how fast does it spread?

Instead, information technology has led to economical destruction from business shutdowns and isolating noninfectious people in their homes for weeks and months on end. Jefferson and Henegan claim they shared their pandemic response program with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson over a month agone, and simply presented information technology to him again. "We urge him to pay attention and comprehend it," they write, adding:

"There are only two things nigh which we can be sure: first, that lockdowns do non work in the long term... The idea that a month of economic hardship will permit some sort of 'reset', assuasive us a brighter hereafter, is a myth. What, when it ends, do nosotros remember will happen? Meanwhile, ever-increasing restrictions volition destroy lives and livelihoods.

The second certainty is this: that nosotros demand to find a way out of the mess that does no more damage than the virus itself... Our strategy would be to tackle the four key failings."

These four areas are:

Addressing the bug in the regime's mass testing programme
Addressing "the bane of confused and contradictory statistics"
Protect and isolate the vulnerable — primarily the elderly, but likewise hospitalized patients in general and staff — while allowing the rest to maintain "some semblance of normal life"
Inform the public about the true and quantifiable costs of lockdown that "kill people only as surely equally COVID-19"

"If we do these things, in that location is real hope that we can larn to live with the virus. That, afterward all, was supposed to be the programme," Jefferson and Henegan annotation. With regard to testing, the pair call "for a national program of testing quality control to ensure that results are accurate, precise and consequent."

Importantly, nosotros must non rely on positive/negative readings alone. The results must exist assessed in relation to other factors, such every bit the age of the discipline and whether they are symptomatic, to decide who actually poses an infectious risk. Y'all can review the full details of their proposed program at the stop of their Daily Mail commodity.

Lockdown Dangers Accept Been Kept Out of Public Discussion

Jefferson and Henegan aren't the just ones highlighting the fact that the global lockdown strategy is causing more harm and destruction than the virus itself. In a June 16, 2022 article in The Federalist, James Lucas, a New York City attorney, wrote:18

"If we're going to allow models and modelers to dictate the entire nature of our society, one would hope that the models are equally complete equally possible. Still the epidemiological models that have so transformed our world are seriously incomplete, and therefore fundamentally inadequate.

Any medical therapy is supposed to be tested for both efficacy and safety. At that place have been several studies examining the effectiveness of the lockdowns in combating the spread of the COVID-xix virus, with mixed conclusions.

And so far, however, none of these studies or models have analyzed the safe side of the lockdown therapy. In response to questions from physician Sens. Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy, Dr. Anthony Fauci admits this side of the equation has non been accounted for in the models now driving our world.

As noted in an open letter recently signed by more than 600 health-care professionals, the public wellness costs from the lockdowns — described equally a 'mass prey incident' are real and growing.

These models are estimations based on existing research. The constantly irresolute projections of coronavirus deaths are extrapolations from enquiry on previous epidemics. Yet modelers have no excuse for leaving evaluations of the lockdowns' massive costs to public wellness out of their models."

The Hidden Costs of Lockdowns

How does the "lockdown therapy" touch on public safety? In his article, Lucas highlights the following:

Increased chronic disease rates due to unemployment, poverty and putting non-COVID medical care on hold — Research23 by the Veterans Administration has shown delaying cancer treatment for just one calendar month led to a 20% increase in mortality. Another report found each 1-month filibuster in breast cancer diagnosis increased bloodshed by ten%

Increased rates of mental wellness problems due to unemployment and isolation

Increased mortality rates from suicide — In one study, being unemployed was associated with a twofold to threefold higher relative risk of suicide. A more recent study estimates "deaths of despair" linked to lockdowns may be around 75,000 in the U.Southward.

Reduced collective life span — Extended unemployment is as well associated with shorter, unhealthier lives. Hannes Schwandt, a health economics researcher at Northwestern University, estimates an extended economical shutdown could shorten the lifespan of 6.4 one thousand thousand Americans inbound the task market past an average of about two years. Lucas notes:

"If epidemiologists don't intendance to accept business relationship of this toll, another profession must. A study28 just released by a group of Southward African actuaries estimates that the cyberspace reduction in lifespan from increased unemployment and poverty due to a national lockdown volition exceed the increased lifespan due to lives saved from COVID-19 by the lockdown by a factor of 30 to ane.

In other words, each yr of additional life attributable to isolating potential coronavirus victims in the lockdown comes at a toll of 30 years lost due to the negative public health furnishings of a lockdown..."

Lack of education is also associated with significantly shorter life spans and poorer health. High school drop-outs die on average nine years sooner than college graduates, and school closings disproportionally affect poorer students.

Who Pays the Most?

As noted by Lucas, in addition to calculating the overall costs on social club, modelers must too determine "on whom those costs fall," because the costs are non borne as by all. The consequences of the lockdowns disproportionally impact those who are already the almost vulnerable — financially and wellness wise — such as those living about the poverty line, the chronically ill, people with mental illness and minorities in general.

"Contrary to the PR slogan, we are Non all in this together," Lucas writes. "We need less insipid pro-lockdown propaganda extolling the virtues of the 'essential' workers, and more serious analysis of the enormous public health toll the lockdowns are imposing on them. Otherwise, we may come to come across the era of coronavirus equally simply the time where pro-lockdown elites sacrificed the working class31 to protect themselves."

A Pandemic of Fearmongering

An Oct 28, 2022, article featured by the Ron Paul Establish points out that:

"E'er since the declared pandemic erupted this past March the mainstream media has spewed a not-finish stream of misinformation that appears to be laser focused on generating maximum fear among the denizens.

Just the facts and the science simply don't support the grave picture painted of a deadly virus sweeping the land. Aye, we do have a pandemic, but it' a pandemic of ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased fact."

Ix facts that can exist backed up with data "paints a very different picture from the fear and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting citizens," the article states. In addition to the fact that PCR testing is practically useless, for all the reasons already mentioned, these data-backed facts include:

1. A positive test is NOT a "case" — As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2022 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness33 lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible," media and public health officials appear to take purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual disease.

Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of disease. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, "example," has been completely and arbitrarily redefined to hateful someone who tested positive for the presence of viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That'due south fraud."

2. According to the CDC34and other enquiry data,35 the COVID-xix survival rate is over 99%, and the vast bulk of deaths occur in those over 70, which is shut to normal life expectancy.

3. CDC assay reveals 85% of patients testing positive for COVID-xix wore face masks "often" or "e'er" in the two weeks preceding their positive test. As noted in the Ron Paul article,36 "The just rational decision from this study is that cloth confront masks offer trivial if any protection from Covid-19 infection."

4. There are inexpensive, proven successful therapies for COVID-xix —Examples include various regimens involving hydroxychloroquine with zinc and antibiotics, quercetin-based protocols, the MATH+ protocol and nebulized hydrogen peroxide.

5. The death rate has not risen despite pandemic deaths — Data37,38 testify the overall all-cause bloodshed has remained steady during 2022 and doesn't veer from the norm. In other words, COVID-xix has not killed off more of the population than would have died in any given year anyway.

As noted in the Ron Paul article, "According to the CDC as of early on May 2022 the total number of deaths in the U.s. was 944,251 from January ane — April 30th. This is really slightly lower than the number of deaths during the aforementioned menstruation in 2022 when 946,067 total deaths were reported."

15,000 Doctors and Scientists Call for Stop to Lockdowns

All in all, in that location are many reasons to suspect that connected lockdowns, social distancing and mask mandates are completely unnecessary and will not significantly alter the course of this pandemic illness, or the final death count.

And, with regard to universal PCR testing where individuals are tested every two weeks or even more than oftentimes, whether they have symptoms or non, this is conspicuously a pointless effort that yields useless information. It's but a tool to spread fear, which in turn allows for the rapid implementation of the totalitarian command mechanisms required to pull off The Nifty Reset. Fortunately, more and more people are now starting to come across through this plot.

About 45,000 scientists and doctors worldwide have already signed the Great Barrington Proclamation, which calls for the end to all lockdowns and implementation of a herd immunity approach to the pandemic, pregnant governments should allow people who are not at significant take chances of serious COVID-nineteen illness to become back to normal life, as the lockdown approach is having a devastating effect on public health — far worse than the virus itself. The declaration states:

"Coming from both the left and right, and around the earth, we accept devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health...

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd amnesty, is to allow those who are at minimal gamble of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to coronavirus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We phone call this focused protection."

The announcement points out that current lockdown policies volition result in excess mortality in the future, primarily among younger people and the working course. Every bit of November 5, 2022, The Great Barrington Announcement had been signed past 11,791 medical and public health scientists, 33,903 medical practitioners and 617,685 "concerned citizens."